Key Points
China’s policymakers understand that continuing development will require using less energy to produce more economic growth – and are betting on the nation’s largest 1,000 businesses to make it happen.
So far, that bet appears to be paying off. More than halfway through a 5-year effort, the companies are on track to meet - and exceed - their goal to save 100 million tons of coal equivalent (mtce) by 2010.i Success will prevent the release of hundreds of millions of tons of greenhouse gases into the atmosphere.
The “Top-1,000 Energy-Consuming Enterprises Program” was unveiled in 2006 as part of a larger effort to curb China’s growing appetite for energy. China’s 1,000 biggest companies are responsible for about one-third of its energy use, and a similar share of energy-related CO2 emissions. As such, officials recognized, this set of industries – which includes steel mills, chemical factories, coal mines, and power plants - provided a ripe target for improving efficiency and cutting greenhouse gases.
In 2006, the National Development and Reform Commission, China’s top economic planning agency, assigned efficiency targets for each of the Top-1000 enterprises. The central government followed a “carrots and sticks” approach to compliance. Incentives such as financial grants for new equipment are made available to support efficiency projects that would save at least 10,000 mtce. The plants undertook audits on their own, with some oversight by the provincial governments. The energy goals are incorporated into the official performance evaluation and promotion system for provincial officials, providing a strong incentive for them to ensure targets are reached in their jurisdiction.

Almost all of the companies now have plans, which in 2007 alone, spawned more than 8,000 energy saving projects ranging from factory retrofits to scrapping inefficient machines. Less than halfway through the program, these projects had already saved nearly 60 mtce. According to a report led by Lynn Price at the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (LBNL), if the program continues at its current pace of savings, “Top-1000 Enterprises” will exceed its initial goal and could save over 400 million metric tons of carbon dioxide by 2010.iii
Some indicators of the program’s success include the following:
However, challenges do remain. The enterprises have found the task of conducting energy audits difficult, for instance, and further tweaking in the area of supporting policies has been proposed. But if its targets are met, “Top-1000 Enterprises” program could carry China a quarter of the way toward its overall 2010 energy reduction goal, propelling the nation towards a lower-carbon future.iv

| Notes and References |
|---|
| i Energy use and energy savings are reported in Chinese units of million metric tons of coal equivalent (Mtce). One Mtce equals 0.29 exajoules (EJs) and 0.28 quadrillion British thermal units (Quads). |
| ii Price, Lynn, Wang Xuejun, and Jiang Yun. (June 2008). “China’s Top-1000 Energy-Consuming Enterprises Program: Reducing Energy Consumption of the 1000 Largest Industrial Enterprises in China.” Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory. Available at: http://china.lbl.gov/sites/china.lbl.gov/files/LBNL_519E._Top-1000_Energ... |
| iii Price et al., 2008 |
| iv This goal is a 20% reduction in energy intensity of China’s economy (the amount of energy consumed per dollar of Gross Domestic Product) by 2010. See ChinaFAQs: An Intense Push for Energy Efficiency for more information. |
| v a) Top-1000 program energy consumption is typically reported in final energy units (dark blue box). b) The shaded area provides the Mtce equivalent of electricity generation, transmission, and distribution losses so that the Top-1000 program can be compared in primary energy terms with the other two bars. Industry sub-sector breakdown based on LBNL model, not Chinese statistics. Price et al., 2008. |
v2.2 11/11/09
BP Statistical Review of World Energy
Carbon Dioxide Information Analysis Center (ORNL)
China Energy Databook (LBNL)
Climate Analysis Indicator Tool (CAIT)
Emissions Database for Global Atmospheric Research (EDGAR)
Energy Information Administration (EIA)
International Energy Agency (IEA)
The World Bank
UN Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC)
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)