US-China Clean Energy Cooperation and CCS
On January 18, at a ceremony at the US-China Strategic Forum on Clean Energy Cooperation in Washington, D.C., U.S. Department of Energy Secretary Steven Chu and China’s Energy Minister Zhang Guogao and Science and Technology Minister Wan Gang signed an agreement to advance the US-China Clean Energy Research Center (CERC). The agreement was announced as part of a “new era” of clean energy cooperation, as Jon Huntsman, U.S. Ambassador to China, put it at the event.
The U.S. and Chinese governments have been cooperating on clean energy technologies for decades, but the CERC program arguably represents a fundamentally new way of working together. In the past, collaboration on clean energy has taken place on a government-to-government, academic-to-academic, and business-to-business basis. But this program integrates activities into what both sides have said they wanted for a long time – a genuine public-private partnership.
The program— funded by a bilateral $150 million in public-private funding— includes research groups, or “consortia,” focused on building efficiency, electric vehicles, and advanced coal technologies, including carbon dioxide capture and storage (CCS). Each consortium is led by a research institution and includes private sector partners— and the World Resources Institute is one of groups focusing on advanced coal and CCS.
The collaboration is significant since both countries face critical choices in their energy mix, and technology and policy choices. Both countries continue to be heavily dependent on coal, as the top two coal consumers in the world. And, both countries stand to benefit from the experience and lessons of this collaborative initiative.
China and Coal
While China has made advancements in renewable energy and energy efficiency production, it still relies on coal as its main energy source. Last year, China was the world’s leading coal consumer, using 3.5 billion short tons of coal (2009 data, EIA). And, although China produces most of its own coal, as the New York Times recently pointed out, China is now importing major amounts from other countries, including the United States— from which it brought in some 2.9 million tons in the first six months of 2010 alone.
The United States also uses large amounts of coal—1.4 billion short tons (2009 data, EIA). Although coal production and use is declining in the United States, it continues to be a major aspect of the country’s energy mix.
China’s coal dependence will continue into the foreseeable future, especially as its economy becomes more modern and the country provides its people a higher quality of life. Estimating China’s long-term coal use is difficult because it continues to make policy and technology changes to cut its growth. According to the U.S. Energy Information Agency’s estimate, China’s use of coal in the electricity sector will increase from 27.7 quadrillion Btu in 2007 to 72.2 quadrillion Btu in 2035 (based on a “business as usual growth”)— which is an average rate of 3.5 percent per year.
China and CCS
In order to meet its growing energy demands, yet constrain its emissions– both traditional air pollutants and greenhouse gases– China has been working to substitute non-coal energy sources, use coal more efficiently, and address its emissions directly. These efforts include increasing energy efficiency, deploying nuclear and renewable energy, and implementing carbon dioxide capture and storage (CCS).
If China is going to meet its emissions targets in the future, many analysts and academics agree that CCS will be needed. Even with advances in efficiency, renewables, and nuclear energy, without CCS, China’s emissions would stabilize around 2030, but would not actually decline. (See: The China Human Development Report 2009/10.)
These modeling efforts, however, assume that CCS technology will be available and implemented at a much greater scale than is currently available. Researchers, including members of the CERC, are evaluating ways to reduce the energy and water penalties associated with the CCS and to ensure that it can be deployed widely.
That’s why the the CERC represents an important pilot project. The joint work plan announced for the advanced coal technology consortium features on-the-ground collaboration and research around existing complementary demonstration projects. The U.S. funding goes to researchers in the United States who will be working with their Chinese counterparts who focus on the same issues in China.
Both Countries’ Interest
In his opening remarks at the Clean Energy Forum, Zheng Bijian, Chairman of the China Institute for Innovation & Development Strategy, reminded participants that Chinese investment in the United States surpassed United States investment in China last year. The countries’ economies are increasingly interdependent – as are the energy and environmental challenges they face. Zheng said, “It is both necessary and possible to work together,” and he spoke of a future where our two countries find and foster “communities of common interest.”
Reducing emissions, shifting to cleaner energy sources, and implementing advanced coal technologies are clearly areas of common interest to the United States and China. The CERC serves a prime example of joint collaboration to advance clean energy development and deployment.
Expert Blog Posts
Blog Roll
Experts In the News
Experts
- Nathaniel Aden , World Resources Institute
- Edward Cunningham , Boston University
- Erica Downs , The Brookings Institution
- Meredydd Evans , Pacific Northwest National Laboratory
- Barbara Finamore , Natural Resources Defense Council
- Jerry Fletcher , West Virginia University
- Sarah Forbes , World Resources Institute
- David Fridley , Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
- Kelly Sims Gallagher , Tufts University
- Banning Garrett , Atlantic Council
- Stephen Hammer , Massachusetts Institute of Technology
- Melanie Hart , Center for American Progress
- Mikkal Herberg , The National Bureau of Asian Research
- Isabel Hilton , Chinadialogue
- Trevor Houser , Peterson Institute for International Economics
- S.T. Hsieh , Tulane University
- Angel Hsu , Yale University
- Daniel Kammen , University of California, Berkeley
- Robert Kapp , Robert A. Kapp and Associates
- Albert Keidel , Atlantic Council
- David Kline , National Renewable Energy Laboratory
- Bo Kong , Johns Hopkins University
- Michael Levi , Council on Foreign Relations
- Mark Levine , Lawrence Berkeley National Lab
- Joanna Lewis , Georgetown University
- Kenneth Lieberthal , The Brookings Institution
- Haibing Ma , Worldwatch Institute
- Denise Mauzerall , Princeton University
- Irving Mintzer , Potomac Energy Fund
- Chris Nielsen , Harvard University
- Rose Niu , World Wildlife Fund
- Stephanie Ohshita , Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
- Huei Peng , University of Michigan
- Lynn Price , Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
- David Pumphrey , Center for Strategic and International Studies
- JingJing Qian , Natural Resources Defense Council
- Rod Quinn , Pacific Northwest National Laboratory
- Luke Schoen , Tsinghua-Berkeley Inter-University Program
- Deborah Seligsohn , World Resources Institute
- Monisha Shah , National Renewable Energy Laboratory
- Bo Shen , Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
- Edward Steinfeld , Massachusetts Institute of Technology
- Kevin Tu , Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
- Jennifer Turner , Woodrow Wilson Center
- Alex Wang , UC Berkeley Boalt Law School
- Elizabeth Wilson , University of Minnesota
- Julian Wong , Green Leap Forward
- Ailun Yang , World Resources Institute
- Zhang Xiaoquan , The Nature Conservancy
- Nan Zhou , Lawrence Berkeley National Lab
Data Sources
BP Statistical Review of World Energy
Carbon Dioxide Information Analysis Center (ORNL)
China Energy Databook (LBNL)
Key China Energy Statistics 2011 (LBNL)
Climate Analysis Indicator Tool (CAIT)
Emissions Database for Global Atmospheric Research (EDGAR)
Energy Information Administration (EIA)
International Energy Agency (IEA)
The World Bank
UN Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC)
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
