China’s Energy and Climate Initiatives: Successes, Challenges, and Implications for U.S. Policies
On April 5, 2011, the Environmental and Energy Study Institute (EESI) and ChinaFAQs held a briefing on China’s increasing role in advancing renewable energy, energy efficiency, and climate policies. China is a leader in the deployment of clean energy technologies, and the world’s largest manufacturer of wind turbines and solar panels. The United States and China cooperate on a number of clean energy initiatives, producing benefits for both countries. However, China has emerged as a major competitor with the United States and other countries in clean energy technology on a global scale. Moreover, some commentators in each country see the other country as a roadblock to an international climate agreement, and China and the United States emit the most greenhouse gases in the world. Speakers highlighted key aspects of China’s approach to clean energy and climate policy, how it fits into the global landscape, and the challenges and opportunities for U.S. efforts to develop clean energy and tackle climate change. Speakers for this event included:
- Joanna Lewis, Assistant Professor of Science, Technology, and International Affairs, Georgetown University’s School of Foreign Service
Presentation (pdf format) - Deborah Seligsohn, Principal Advisor to the China, Energy and Climate Program, World Resources Institute Beijing office
- Mark Levine, Senior Staff Scientist and Group Leader (Founder), China Energy Group, Lawrence Berkeley National Lab
Presentation (pdf format) - Sun Guoshun, First Secretary, Embassy of the People's Republic of China
Presentation (pdf format) - Kathy Weiss, Vice President, Government Relations, First Solar
Presentation (pdf format)
Highlights from Speaker Presentations:
- China is now the global manufacturing leader of most renewable energy technologies, and the largest user of clean energy. In 2010 alone, clean energy investment in China topped $154 billion, while approximately 77 gigawatts of old fossil fuel power was shut down.
- These achievements were accomplished by a variety of targets and priorities such as the “Top 1000 Enterprises Program”, which focused on reducing energy consumption in the largest enterprises in the country, the “10 Key Projects” program, a financial incentive program, and redefining strategic industries, focusing more on new energy, energy saving and high-end and next generation information technology, to name a few.
- While enormous progress had been made from 1980 to 2002 to decouple China’s economic growth from its energy demand, there was an increase in energy intensity from 2002 to 2005. However, the downward trend of China’s energy intensity has continued again since 2006.
- Deborah Seligsohn of the World Resources Institute (WRI) remarked that China is taking action on clean energy and environmental policy out of its own self interest. The transformation occurring in the energy industry is also a driver for their economic policy. In the past, much more focus was placed on securing imported energy and maintaining supply.
- China has recognized the damage that climate change and environmental problems are causing the country and the need to economically restructure in order to address these issues.
- Dr. Seligsohn pointed out that the key difference between U.S. and Chinese energy policy: in China, energy policy supports its economic vision, whereas the United States still struggles over the question of whether to view clean energy development as a cost or an opportunity.
- Many studies from highly-respected institutions predict that China’s emissions will continue to rise through 2030. However, they do not project further into the future, where Dr. Mark Levine estimated, China’s total energy use will plateau by 2050.
- This conclusion was based on the assumptions that end uses for energy, like appliances, will saturate the market while commercial and residential floor space will plateau—not following the U.S. trajectory because of China’s urban density. Furthermore, demand for steel and cement will wane as China finishes its highway and rail system infrastructure in the next decade and a half.
- Steel and cement production were key reasons why, during the 2002-2005 timeframe, China’s energy intensity rose significantly. One of the other major reasons was its entry into the World Trade Organization and subsequent spike in its export economy.
- Sun Guoshun, First Secretary at the Chinese Embassy, reiterated China’s commitment to clean energy development and tackling climate change. Mr. Sun asked Congressional staffers in attendance to convey the message to Members of Congress that China will cooperate with the United States to address climate change and energy security.
- China’s largest policy driver for solar is the feed-in tariff, and there are reports that China will set a goal of 10-15 gigawatts of solar power by 2015, making it the world leader in installed solar power.
Background:
On March 14, China’s National People’s Congress adopted its 12th Five Year Plan for economic development, which includes new goals for carbon intensity, renewable energy deployment, and energy efficiency. In 2010, China made international headlines for its use of measures such as partial shutdowns of manufacturing plants to meet its energy efficiency goals of the 11th Five Year Plan. While there were many challenges associated with its approach, there were also many positive developments, such as a 19 percent reduction in energy intensity.
For more information, contact Matt Johnson at mjohnson [at] eesi.org or (202) 662-1892, or Luke Schoen at lschoen [at] wri.org or (202) 729-7657.
Expert Blog Posts
Experts In the News
Experts
- Nathaniel Aden , World Resources Institute
- Edward Cunningham , Boston University
- Erica Downs , The Brookings Institution
- Meredydd Evans , Pacific Northwest National Laboratory
- Barbara Finamore , Natural Resources Defense Council
- Sarah Forbes , World Resources Institute
- David Fridley , Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
- Kelly Sims Gallagher , Tufts University
- Banning Garrett , Atlantic Council
- Stephen Hammer , Massachusetts Institute of Technology
- Melanie Hart , Center for American Progress
- Mikkal Herberg , Pacific Council on International Policy
- Isabel Hilton , Chinadialogue
- Trevor Houser , Peterson Institute for International Economics
- S.T. Hsieh , Tulane University
- Angel Hsu , Yale University
- Robert Kapp , Robert A. Kapp and Associates
- Albert Keidel , Atlantic Council
- David Kline , National Renewable Energy Laboratory
- Bo Kong , Johns Hopkins University
- Michael Levi , Council on Foreign Relations
- Mark Levine , Lawrence Berkeley National Lab
- Joanna Lewis , Georgetown University
- Kenneth Lieberthal , The Brookings Institution
- Denise Mauzerall , Princeton University
- Irving Mintzer , Potomac Energy Fund
- Kevin Mo , Natural Resources Defense Council
- Chris Nielsen , Harvard University
- Rose Niu , World Wildlife Fund
- Stephanie Ohshita , Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
- Lynn Price , Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
- David Pumphrey , Center for Strategic and International Studies
- JingJing Qian , Natural Resources Defense Council
- Rod Quinn , Pacific Northwest National Laboratory
- Deborah Seligsohn , World Resources Institute
- Monisha Shah , National Renewable Energy Laboratory
- Bo Shen , Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
- Edward Steinfeld , Massachusetts Institute of Technology
- Kevin Tu , Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
- Jennifer Turner , Woodrow Wilson Center
- Alex Wang , UC Berkeley Boalt Law School
- Elizabeth Wilson , University of Minnesota
- Zhang Xiaoquan , The Nature Conservancy
- Nan Zhou , Lawrence Berkeley National Lab
Data Sources
BP Statistical Review of World Energy
Carbon Dioxide Information Analysis Center (ORNL)
China Energy Databook (LBNL)
Climate Analysis Indicator Tool (CAIT)
Emissions Database for Global Atmospheric Research (EDGAR)
Energy Information Administration (EIA)
International Energy Agency (IEA)
The World Bank
UN Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC)
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
