China-India MOU
With Copenhagen less than two months away, China’s international climate change relations seem in permanent high gear. This week was notable both for a new Memorandum of Understanding between China and India on climate change cooperation, and for a telephone call between U.S. President Barack Obama and Chinese President Hu Jintao to encourage progress toward Copenhagen.
The Chinese climate team spent most of this past week in New Delhi, most notably signing a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) on climate change cooperation with their Indian counterparts. If you take a look at our comparative charts of major countries from our latest policy brief on the U.S. and China, you’ll see that in reality China and India are quite different, both in terms of total emissions and their energy use profiles.
But the two countries share both some challenges and some advantages that make increased cooperation between them a potential big winner for both countries and for the world. India and China both have:
- Large populations (over 1 billion) and real resource constraints.
- Relatively plentiful coal supplies.
- Vibrant and rapidly growing renewable energy industries.
- Renowned research universities and institutes.
- A commitment to poverty alleviation, combined with continuing concerns about inequality, especially in rural areas.
They also have very different systems both of government and of corporate governance, which means they often take different approaches. Ideally, sharing best practices might help both countries.
A little competition might be part of the story, as well. For example, both countries are known for their wind industries which to some extent compete against each other. In the world of diplomacy, cooperation and competition may be two sides of the same coin. In the past few months China had been much more aggressive in calling for progress toward Copenhagen. Now India’s Environment Minister has suggested perhaps some change in India’s approach – the news on this has been moving rapidly, but perhaps the most interesting piece was a couple weeks ago by Jim Yardley in the New York Times (New Script for India on Climate Change). Both countries look like they would like to be seen as bringing the world to agreement on climate change. While continuing to be uncomfortable with discussion of total emissions caps, the dialogue in developing Asia has moved considerably in the last six months, with much more talk of carbon intensity targets (as we discussed last week in relation to Chinese President Hu Jintao’s speech at the United Nations).
This week also featured a telephone call between President Barack Obama and President Hu Jintao, which both countries reported to be focused on climate change. The reported content needless to say was about pushing for a successful deal at Copenhagen. What was most important was that in the midst of all the things happening globally in the world now and politically in the U.S. the two leaders kept the climate priority high on the agenda.
President Hu reportedly suggested that increased cooperation on climate change could improve Sino-U.S. relations. A new report by the U.S. Congressional-Executive Commission on China suggests the same, if not in so many words.
Photo by seaview99, available under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike license.
Expert Blog Posts
Experts In the News
Experts
- Nathaniel Aden , World Resources Institute
- Edward Cunningham , Boston University
- Erica Downs , The Brookings Institution
- Meredydd Evans , Pacific Northwest National Laboratory
- Barbara Finamore , Natural Resources Defense Council
- Sarah Forbes , World Resources Institute
- David Fridley , Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
- Kelly Sims Gallagher , Tufts University
- Banning Garrett , Atlantic Council
- Stephen Hammer , Columbia University / MIT
- Mikkal Herberg , Pacific Council on International Policy
- Isabel Hilton , Chinadialogue
- Trevor Houser , Peterson Institute for International Economics
- S.T. Hsieh , Tulane University
- Angel Hsu , Yale University
- Robert Kapp , Robert A. Kapp and Associates
- Albert Keidel , Atlantic Council
- David Kline , National Renewable Energy Laboratory
- Bo Kong , Johns Hopkins University
- Michael Levi , Council on Foreign Relations
- Mark Levine , Lawrence Berkeley National Lab
- Joanna Lewis , Georgetown University
- Kenneth Lieberthal , The Brookings Institution
- Denise Mauzerall , Princeton University
- Irving Mintzer , Potomac Energy Fund
- Kevin Mo , Natural Resources Defense Council
- Chris Nielsen , Harvard University
- Rose Niu , World Wildlife Fund
- Stephanie Ohshita , Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
- Lynn Price , Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
- David Pumphrey , Center for Strategic and International Studies
- JingJing Qian , Natural Resources Defense Council
- Rod Quinn , Pacific Northwest National Laboratory
- Deborah Seligsohn , World Resources Institute
- Monisha Shah , National Renewable Energy Laboratory
- Bo Shen , Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
- Edward Steinfeld , Massachusetts Institute of Technology
- Kevin Tu , Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
- Jennifer Turner , Woodrow Wilson Center
- Alex Wang , UC Berkeley Boalt Law School
- Elizabeth Wilson , University of Minnesota
- Zhang Xiaoquan , The Nature Conservancy
- Nan Zhou , Lawrence Berkeley National Lab
Data Sources
BP Statistical Review of World Energy
Carbon Dioxide Information Analysis Center (ORNL)
China Energy Databook (LBNL)
Climate Analysis Indicator Tool (CAIT)
Emissions Database for Global Atmospheric Research (EDGAR)
Energy Information Administration (EIA)
International Energy Agency (IEA)
The World Bank
UN Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC)
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
